Friday, November 22, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Bank Robbery


Every year in the United States, robberies of banking institutions account for millions of dollars of losses. In 2011 -the last complete year for data- more than $38 million was stolen and just over 100 people killed or injured in some 5,000 robberies of financial institutions reported to the FBI. There has been a sharp decline in bank heists since the early 1990's due to better bank security, investigative techniques and tougher sentencing. Thieves have also tended to move into the electronic realm which is obviously less violent and dangerous; while the number of traditional bank robberies has declined, crimes involving ATMs and online scams have soared.

Banks are insured by the federal government, and when one is robbed the accused is charged with a federal felony offense. These cases are tried in federal court and the prosecutors are highly dedicated and skilled attorneys working with the full support of federal law enforcement branches such as the FBI. Bank Robbery as a crime is defined in 18 U.S.C. Section 2113(a) ; to establish charges of bank robbery the prosecution must prove that a person took or tried to take money or property from a federally insured institution. This included credit unions, savings and loan associations and even robbery of ATMs. Taking money by fraud or larceny does not qualify as a bank robbery and is considered a different crime.

Because bank robbery is always a federal offense the penalties are higher than those for many other types of crime some bank robberies have a penalty of life in prison. Bank robbery does not require the use of a dangerous weapon, but a person's sentence increases substantially if a dangerous weapon is used; courts have ruled that even harmless objects appearing to be weapons, or a "threat of death" such as simply stating "I have a gun", or even a gesture  can trigger the enhancement. If a co-defendant uses a weapon, the enhancement will apply to any defendant who knew or should have known about the use of the dangerous weapon. Even if no weapon is used any bank robbery is still considered to be "done with force and intimidation", as even a note passed to a teller can be considered intimidation. The use of a note during a bank robbery does not constitute armed robbery, but may still be considered a crime of violence.

Federal law divides the offense of bank robbery into five phases, making each step a separate crime:

  • Entering the financial institution with the intent to commit a crime
  • Taking/carrying away property (escape), with anyone assisting being a principle to the crime
  • Concealing/possessing/disposing of the property, with anyone assisting being a principle to the crime
  • Penalties are more severe if a weapon or device was used or anyone was assaulted
  • If a killing or kidnapping occurs during the commission of the crime, the death penalty can be given
A conviction for bank robbery can result in a range of punishments including fines and prison time. A basic robbery conviction can receive anywhere from one to 20 years of prison time, dependent on the degree of bank robbery and if there were weapons or injuries involved.

In order to sustain its burden of proof for the crime of armed bank robbery, the government must prove  four essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt; that the accused took money that was in the care, custody, or possession of a bank, that the taking was by force and violence or intimidation, that the accused deliberately assaulted or put the life of the person in jeopardy by the use of a dangerous weapon or device while taking the money; and that the deposits of the bank were then insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 

Federal criminal law is a very serious and complex body of law; therefore, federal criminal defense is a highly specialized legal practice area. Being accused of a federal crime is extremely serious and may result in life changing consequences.
If you have been charged with or are under investigation for any federal crime you need an experienced criminal defense lawyer. Contact the Law Offices of Richard Kuniansky today at (713) 622-8333 or visit www.kunianskylaw.com today for a free consultation.
We will work tirelessly to ensure the best possible outcome for your case.



Thursday, November 21, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Credit Card Fraud



Credit card fraud is one of the most common white collar offenses, and it affects thousands of people every year. Credit or Debit card fraud can involve the outright theft of another person’s credit card, using another person’s credit card without their knowledge, using the identification number of a person’s credit card without actually taking the card, or using another person’s credit card information that has been stored in a computer without their knowledge.

The increasing popularity of online shopping and online banking coupled with the popularity of credit and debit cards as a method of payment may make the temptation for credit card fraud very powerful for many people. Any type of fraud is considered a serious criminal offense in the state of Texas. Credit card fraud in particular is a common offense, and law enforcement will aggressively prosecute anyone alleged to have taken part in this crime. The specific charges brought against you depend on both how the credit card was obtained or used and  the value of the merchandise or services illegally obtained.

Credit Card / Debit Card Abuse essentially means using someone else’s card without their consent. This can be done in person at a store or online at any store web site where there are insufficient security protocols (e.g., no PAN truncation, so the complete card number appears on receipts; or no requests by the seller for authenticating information like a PIN or zip code). Here, the physical card (debit or credit) is in the possession of another person after being “found” or given to them.
Identity theft often finds credit card fraud a lucrative opportunity: once someone has personal information regarding an individual (name, address, SSN, etc.) then it is relatively easy to use that identity information to apply for and receive credit cards in that person’s name. This form of credit card fraud involves using a fake credit card account to buy things online or in person at stores.
Skimming means that the credit card numbers are taken by someone without disturbing the actual plastic card. This can happen during a regular credit transaction – when someone pays for a meal at a restaurant or buys a new computer game at the local shopping mall. Sometimes the numbers are discovered from receipts or other documents that have been discarded, unshredded, in neighborhood trash cans or dumpsters. Other times, the number is lifted online from an unsuspecting person who fills out a survey, etc. The credit card number is then used to purchase items in transactions where the physical card is not required.

According to Texas Penal Code §32.31, a person commits credit card fraud if that person:

  • Presents or uses a credit card or debit card with knowledge that: (A)the card, whether or not expired, has not been issued to him and is not used with the effective consent of the cardholder; or (B)the card has expired or has been revoked or cancelled with the intent to obtain a benefit fraudulently;
  • Uses a fictitious credit card or debit card or the pretended number or description of a fictitious card with intent to obtain a benefit;
  • Receives a benefit that they know has been obtained in violation;
  • Steals a credit card or debit card or, with knowledge that it has been stolen, receives a credit card or debit card with intent to use, sell or transfer it to a person other than the issuer or the cardholder;
  • Purchases a credit card or debit card from a person who he knows is not the issuer;
  • Sells a credit card or debit card, not being the issuer;            
  • Uses or induces the cardholder to use the cardholder's credit card or debit card to obtain property or service for the actor's benefit for which the cardholder is financially unable to pay;
  • Possesses a credit card or debit card with intent to use it without the effective consent of the cardholder, or
  • Being authorized by an issuer to furnish goods or services on presentation of a credit card or debit card, with intent to defraud the issuer or a cardholder, fails to furnish goods or services represented in writing to the issuer.
A conviction for a state jail felony credit card fraud offense can lead to at least 180 days in a jail up to two years in jail and/or a fine not more than $10,000; if the credit card fraud is committed against an elderly person, the alleged offender could receive a conviction for a felony of the third degree which can result in a prison sentence ranging from two to ten years and/or fines up to $10,000. Punishments for a conviction will also vary depending on whether the alleged offender already has a felony conviction, caused the death or serious bodily injury to another when they committed the offense, and/or used a weapon during the commission of the offense.

If you believe you may be under investigation for a white collar crime, it is critical to your case that you hire a qualified criminal defense attorney right away. Do not risk having your rights violated by neglecting to retain a skilled, experienced criminal defense attorney. Contact the Houston, Texas law offices of Richard Kuniansky today at 713-622-8333 or visit www.kunianskylaw.com for a free consultation. We will work diligently to ensure your rights are protected.



Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Sex Trafficking and Slavery


Trafficking in Persons (Human Trafficking) is defined as:
  1. Sex trafficking in which a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age; or
  2. The recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision or obtaining of a person for labor or services, through the use of force, fraud or coercion for the purpose of subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage or slavery.

Human trafficking is often synonymous with slavery because the victims are usually subjected to involuntary labor or sex work. Human traffickers generally isolate their victims, making them dependent on their abusers through  both physical and psychological abuse.
The problem of human trafficking has multiplied exponentially in the United States in recent years. Although the idea of slave labor and child prostitution is deplorable to most Americans, statistics show that the United States is a leading destination for human trafficking. According to the National Human Trafficking Resource Center an estimated 100,000 to 300,000 children are victims of child exploitation in the United States each year. And though many people believe that victims of human trafficking are undocumented immigrants, statistics report that 83 percent of victims are United States citizens. This makes human trafficking the second most profitable organized crime, following only drug trafficking.

Human trafficking is often confused with human smuggling, but in fact they are separate legal issues even though they may be related. Human (or migrant) smuggling involves the deliberate concealing of people with the intent to transport them into the country without proper documentation. Although illegal immigrants often become victims of human trafficking through debt servitude, trafficking in persons is a separate offense.
Human trafficking does not require transportation as a defining characteristic, although victims may be moved from city to city. In cases of forced domestic servitude the victim typically remains in one place.

According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime human trafficking is defined by three elements:
  • Act; the actual recruitment, transport, transfer, harboring, or receipt of persons
  • Means; the threat or use of force, coercion, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or vulnerability, giving payments or benefits
  • Purpose; exploitation of victims including prostitution, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, removal of organs, and other types of exploitation

Federal anti-trafficking legislation includes two notable acts on which most state laws are based: the  William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 and the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2013, part of the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013.


The United States Criminal Code defines and prohibits human trafficking in 18 USC Chapter 77: Peonage, Slavery, and Trafficking in persons, setting forth the following penalties:
  • Forced labor and Trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor: maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison; if a kidnapping, attempted kidnapping, sexual assault, attempted murder, or death occur, the maximum penalty is life in prison 
  • Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion – minimum of 10 years to life if the victim is aged 14 to 17; if the victim is under the age of 14, the penalty is 15 years to life. 

Human Trafficking in Texas

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Houston, Texas is one of the nation’s largest hubs for human trafficking. There are over 200 active brothels in Houston along with multiple strip clubs and illicit spas that serve as fronts for sex trafficking. Proximity, demographics and a large migrant labor force all contribute to high levels of trafficking through Houston and the rest of Texas; Houston’s proximity to the Mexican border, I-10 which runs through the city and across the country, the port of Houston and two large airports combine to make it a popular point of entry for international trafficking. Houston’s huge geographic size and large Hispanic, Asian and Middle Eastern populations create optimal conditions for trafficking because of the ability to blend in with the community.
Also, Texas businesses employ migrant labors in many different sectors such as textiles, agriculture, restaurants, construction, and domestic work. This vast diversity makes it difficult for law enforcement to concentrate on any one labor sector in fighting human trafficking.

Texas State law specifically addresses human trafficking in Chapter 20A of the Texas Penal Code, defining the acts of knowingly trafficking for the purpose of using a person for forced or harmful labor, benefiting from human slavery activities or subjecting a trafficking victim to continuous sexual abuse, prostitution or illegal forms of pornography as first degree felonies. The exact punishment for a trafficking of persons conviction will vary in accordance with the defendant’s prior criminal record and whether a weapon was employed to commit the crime, but sentences can include five to 99 years in prison, a maximum fine of $10,000 and mandatory sex offender registration.

Texas human trafficking laws are difficult to interpret, and overly exuberant prosecutors frequently accuse people of committing human trafficking or sex trafficking even when the available evidence may not support the allegations. The prosecution is legally required to prove every element of a human trafficking charge beyond a reasonable doubt. If you believe you may be under Federal or State investigation for human trafficking, it is critical to your case that you hire a qualified criminal defense attorney right away. Visit the website of Richard Kuniansky at www.kunianskylaw.com or call (713) 622-8333 today for a free consultation.









Monday, November 18, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Identity Theft


Identity theft occurs when someone uses another individual's personally identifying information without their consent, such as their name, Social Security number or credit or debit card information. With the advent of the internet identity theft has become much more common, and both Federal and State governments have established specific laws in order to combat it.

United States Federal law has two statutes that address the crime of identity theft: 18 USC 1028, passed in 1998, and 18 USC 1028A which was passed in 2004.
The offense of identity theft was established by section 1028(a)(7), which provides that a person is guilty of identity theft if he uses the identifying information of another in connection with any federal crime or any state or local felony. The federal crime of identity theft requires a predicate offense, i.e., a person can only be charged with identity theft if they first commit another crime while using a stolen identity.

18 USC 1028A established the offense of aggravated identity theft, prohibiting the use of identifying information belonging to another in regards to certain federal offenses and/or in relation to terrorism offenses.
Aggravated identity theft has a mandatory two-year sentence in the Bureau of Prisons. This sentence must be served consecutively to any other sentence.

The consecutive nature of sentencing is important because the case always involves two sentences; whatever the sentences for the underlying crime, a person charged with aggravated identity theft must serve two years after that. The only situation in which the court may sentence the defendant to concurrent sentences for aggravated identity theft is where there are multiple convictions for aggravated identity theft. In this instance, each two-year consecutive sentence for aggravated identity theft may be served at the same time, but always after the sentence on the underlying crime.
18 USC 1028A provides that a person is guilty of aggravated identity theft where he or she commits a crime and also “knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person.”
Some crimes which trigger the federal aggravated identity theft statute are:
  • Theft of public money or property
  • Theft, embezzlement, or misapplication by a bank officer or employee
  • False personation of citizenship
  • False statements made in connection with the acquisition of a firearm
  • Any crime relating to mail, bank, and wire fraud
  • Any crime relating to nationality, citizenship, passports, visas and various other immigration offenses
  • False statements relating to Social Security programs
In the State of Texas identity theft falls under Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 32.51, if an individual obtains, possesses, transfers, or uses the following with the intent to harm or defraud another person:
  • Identifying information of another person without their consent,
  • A deceased person’s information that would be identifying if they were alive, and/or
  • Identifying information of a person who is younger than 18 years old.
In Texas conviction for identity theft can result in a state felony depending on the number of pieces of identifying information the alleged offender had. This can include a person’s name, social security number, date of birth, address or financial institution account numbers.
Chapter 12 of the Texas Penal Code defines the standard penalties for identity theft offenses, and suggested punishments can increase depending on whether the alleged offender has been convicted for another felony offense, committed the offense against an elderly person, caused death or serious bodily injury to another person during the commission of the ID theft offense and/or used a weapon while committing or attempting to commit the offense. Penalties under Texas State Law include:
  • State jail felony identity theft: 180 days to two years in Texas jail and/or a fine not more than $10,000.
  • Third degree identity theft: two to ten years and/or fines not exceeding $10,000.
  • Second degree identity theft: 20 year prison sentence and/or a fine up to $10,000.
  • First degree identity theft: five to 99 years in prison or up to life in prison and/or a fine up to $10,000.

If you or one you know is currently under investigation for identity theft in Texas, Kuniansky & Associates are entirely committed to protecting your rights. We can provide a thorough evaluation of all the facts of your case, prepare a powerful defense, and use our strong courtroom skills and extensive experience to effectively advocate on your behalf. It is critical to your case that you hire a qualified criminal defense attorney right away. Visit www.kunianskylaw.com for a free case evaluation, or call (713) 622-8333 to speak with a qualified criminal defense attorney.

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Immigration Fraud


Federal immigration law determines whether a person is an alien and also provides means by which certain aliens can become naturalized citizens, as well as regulating who may enter the country, how long they can stay and when they must leave. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 continues to be the basic immigration law of the country: the most significant amendment to the INA abolished the natural origin provisions and established a new quota system in 1965.
Foreign-born non-citizens residing in the United States are subdivided into immigrants and non-immigrants. Immigrants are foreign-born non-citizens that are able to apply for citizenship. Non-immigrants are foreign-born non-citizens who are not able to apply for citizenship, such as diplomatic staff, temporary workers, students, tourists, etc.
There are four broad categories of foreign-born people in the United States:
  • US citizens born outside the United States (naturalized
  • Foreign-born non-citizens with current visa to reside and/or work in the US (documented)
  • Foreign-born non-citizens without a current visa but that are not prohibited from entry (undocumented)
  • Foreign-born non-citizens in the United States that are prohibited from entry (illegal)
There are two basic types of immigration fraud: document fraud and benefit application fraud. While both are widespread, immigration investigators often consider benefit fraud far more dangerous. Although document fraud is prevalent victims often remain below the radar in fear that they will be discovered. On the other hand, if an immigrant acquires legitimate documents and benefits through fraudulent means that immigrant might never be detected.

Immigration Document Fraud refers to the manufacture, sale or use of counterfeit identity documents such as fake driver’s licenses, birth certificates, social security cards, or passports, for immigration fraud or other criminal activity. Document fraud also includes efforts to obtain genuine identity documents through fraudulent means. Immigration benefit fraud refers to the misrepresentation or omission of material facts on an application to obtain an immigration benefit one is not entitled to—such as U.S. citizenship, political asylum or a valid visa.
 One of the most common types of benefit fraud is marriage fraud; foreigners and illegal immigrants often use short-term or fraudulent marriages to gain U.S. green cards and citizenship.
The immigration laws of the United States provide for severe penalties, including potential lifetime exclusion from the United States, for those who try to procure immigration benefits through fraud or misrepresentation. Because obtaining a green card through marriage is famously one of the fastest (and sometimes only) methods, USCIS knows that there will always be those who attempt to obtain permanent residence through a false marriage. Unfortunately, this tends to raise the scrutiny on all applicants to the extent some couples who indeed do share a true marriage, are subject to invasive and stressful immigration fraud investigations.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was established in March 2003 as the primary investigative arm of the Department of Homeland Security. ICE is comprised of five integrated divisions that are responsiles for a number of key homeland security priorities. ICE enforces the nation’s immigration and customs laws and protects federal facilities. Operational Divisions include:
  • Investigations, responsible for investigating both domestic and international activities arising from the movement of people and goods that violate immigration and custom laws and threaten national security.
  • Detention and Removal Operations, responsible for ensuring the departure from the United States of all removable aliens and enforcing the nation’s immigration laws.
  • Federal Protective Service, responsible for policing, securing and ensuring a safe environment in which federal agencies can conduct their business, and
  • The Office of Intelligence, responsible for the collection, analysis, and dissemination of strategic and tactical intelligence data for use by operational elements of ICE and DHS.
Immigration-related investigations and arrests often target Americans or legal residents of the U.S. who have facilitated illegal immigration, knowingly or unknowingly. Those who are found guilty of immigration fraud will suffer severe legal consequences.

If you believe you may be under federal investigation for immigration fraud, it is critical to your case that you hire a qualified criminal defense attorney right away. Do not risk having your rights violated by neglecting to retain a skilled, experienced criminal defense attorney. The Houston, Texas law office of Kuniansky & Associates will work diligently to ensure your rights are protected. Visit www.immigration-fraud-attorney.com or call (713) 622 8333 for a free consultation.



Sunday, November 3, 2013

Counterfeit Goods and Pirating


Counterfeiting is a form of trademark infringement, and includes intentionally manufacturing or selling goods or services bearing fake trademarks; for example, deliberately duplicating the Adidas trademark on shoes not manufactured by the company. Although the counterfeiter’s primary purpose is to confuse consumers,
it’s still counterfeiting even if both buyers and sellers are aware that the product is not genuine.

The term “knockoff” is often used as a substitute for counterfeit, however while some knockoffs may imitate an established product they may not necessarily infringe; if the design of the underlying work -a dress, for example- is not protected under the law, the knockoff  may not violate any legal rules unless it includes a counterfeit trademark or other copyrighted design. In addition, the counterfeiter must have duplicated the trademark on the goods or services for which the trademark was federally registered; for example, it is not counterfeiting to put the Gucci mark on automobile seat covers as these are not goods for which Gucci has a registered trademark.
Although the sales of counterfeit goods is aggressively prosecuted  it is difficult to hold a person liable for purchasing them, especially if the item is for personal use and/or they bought it without knowing that it was fake.

According to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), counterfeit goods account for from 5 percent to 7 percent of world trade. As a result, prosecuting distributors of counterfeit goods has become a priority for law enforcement. 

Not only do the designers and manufacturers of legitimate products lose money, but their brands’ reputation is compromised by inferior fakes. Counterfeit Drugs seldom meet FDA standards, putting the health of those who use them at risk and opening the door to additional civil and criminal charges.
The counterfeiting industry is complex and highly organized: it often involves the transport of illegal goods across state and international borders. Persons who are arrested for selling counterfeit goods may be  charged with multiple crimes in connection with the sales, including conspiracy and smuggling goods into the U.S. 

Most illegal distributors are caught as a result of online sales (for example, eBay has explicit anti-counterfeiting rules and will banish violators), or because a disgruntled customer or competitor reports them. The trademark owners will generally seek to make an example of counterfeiting businesses in order to prevent others from doing the same.

Statutes outlawing the production and distribution of counterfeit goods include the Stop Counterfeiting in Manufactured Goods Act, the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984 and the Anti-counterfeiting Consumer Protection Act.

Penalties for counterfeit trafficking increase with the value of the items manufactured, sold or distributed; if the value exceeds one thousand dollars the maximum term is 3 to 7 years' imprisonment, and if the value exceeds one hundred thousand dollars you could go to prison for a term of 5 to 15 years. Fines may exceed  $500,000. In addition, a judge has discretion to order that all your goods will be destroyed and authorities may seize the proceeds of any sales along with property such as vehicles used to transport counterfeit products or machinery and tools used in their manufacture.

A simple offer to sell counterfeit products can also trigger liability as a counterfeiter; i.e., offering to sell counterfeit jeans and providing a sample to an undercover police officer. Proof of actual production or sale may not be necessary to prove counterfeiting. Similarly, an Internet Service Provider (ISP) that knowingly hosts websites selling fake merchandise could be liable for contributory infringement.

If you have been charged with sale of counterfeit goods, or their manufacture and distribution, don't wait to obtain expert criminal defense.  contact the offices of Kuniansky and Associates at 713-622-8333 or visit www.kunianskylaw.com for a free consultation.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Bank Fraud






Bank fraud is a federal criminal offense that involves any scheme to obtain money, assets or other property that is owned or in the control of a financial institution by fraudulent means. Defrauding any institution insured by the federal government is an offense which is taken very seriously.

One of the most common frauds against financial institution involves loan or mortgage applications. During the last decade many representatives of bank and mortgage companies are reported to have surreptitiously encouraged individuals and businesses to misrepresent their income or other information on mortgage applications: if these borrowers don't make their payments the bank's financial departments will look for misrepresentations and if they find anything they will often turn the case over to the feds for prosecution. In essence, the banks and mortgage lenders are trying to use the government  to collect on bad loans they encouraged people to take in the first place.

Bank fraud is also sometimes perpetrated an employee; this constitutes embezzlement, in which a person entrusted with funds or bank property appropriates it for his or her own use or benefit. For example, a bank employee may borrow funds during a personal emergency and then attempt to replace the missing funds undetected, a move that seldom works.

If you have been accused of bank fraud, your defense depends largely on pre-trial research, the defense strategies employed by your attorney and the motivations of the prosecution. While banks may be eager to press charges in these cases, they are generally more interested in recovering the missing funds. In many cases it may be possible to reach a financial settlement that can minimize or avoid entirely prison time. 

If you have been accused of bank fraud, you need an experienced attorney as soon as possible: contact the offices of Kuniansky and Associates at 713-622-8333 or visit www.kunianskylaw.com for a free consultation.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Accounting Fraud




If you believe you may be under federal investigation for a white collar crime, it is critical to your case that you hire a qualified criminal defense attorney right away. Do not risk having your rights violated by neglecting to retain a skilled, experienced criminal defense attorney. Contact the Houston, Texas, law office of Kuniansky & Associates today at 713-622-8333 or visit www.kunianskylaw.com. We will work diligently to ensure your rights are protected.

 While the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 enacted post-Enron reforms, accounting fraud is still rampant in both public and private operations alike. In 2010 the executives at Lehman Bros. were accused of fraud, and the actions of Ponzi schemer Bernard Madoff were widely publicized. Healthcare South shareholders plan to finalize a settlement agreement in July 2010 against accounting firm Ernst & Young and Swiss bank, UBS AG, seeking restitution for their part in a multi-billion dollar accounting fraud scandal.

Allegations of accounting fraud may cause serious damage to the reputation of any corporation or business.  The majority of accounting fraud investigations stem from authorities pursuing a case where there is suspicion of corporate fraud and there are signs indicating that evidence of falsified statements, documents, and or transactions exist.  In many cases, federal prosecutors and investigators are involved when someone is suspected of accounting fraud. In these cases the federal prosecution often casts a wide net, bringing charges against persons who may not have had any prior knowledge of the deception.

The accounting practices of smaller businesses in regulated industries are also scrutinized in a manner once reserved for public companies.  What were once viewed as honest, innocent accounting errors can be lumped into an overly aggressive investigation by prosecutors and regulators and pursued as a potential violation of the criminal law.  These sorts of investigations often turn upon very specific and technical accounting practices and decisions.  If you are under investigation for allegations of deceptive accounting methods it is important to hire a white collar criminal defense attorney who is experienced in these complex cases.  

Richard Kuniansky has 28 years experience with white collar crime cases and has a unique understanding of the government's strategy. Contact Kuniansky & Associates today at  713-622-8333 or visit www.kunianskylaw.com for committed legal advocacy.

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Federal Crimes



 In the United States criminal law and prosecution exist at both the federal and the state levels; thus a “federal crime” is one that is prosecuted under federal criminal law, and not under a state's criminal law. This includes many acts that would not otherwise even be crimes under state or local law.
Some federal crimes are listed in Title 18 of the United States Code, but others fall under other titles; for instance, tax evasion and possession of weapons banned by the National Firearms Act are criminalized in Title 26 of the United States Code.

There are 93 United States Attorneys (also known as federal prosecutors) in the United States, with one assigned to each judicial district. Each U.S. Attorney is the chief federal law enforcement officer within his or her particular jurisdiction, and is appointed by the President of the United States for a term of four years with appointments subject to confirmation by the Senate. The U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) is the chief prosecutor for the United States in criminal law cases, and represents the United States in civil law cases as either the defendant or plaintiff, as appropriate.

The federal criminal system resembles the state system in many ways, but there are some very significant differences. The typical United States Attorney's office, which bears the responsibility of responsible for prosecuting federal criminal charges, has significantly more time and resources than a state prosecutor.
Federal prosecutors may also have a great deal of latitude in selecting the cases they wish to prosecute through the federal courts. Cases which fall exclusively to the jurisdiction of a federal prosecutor tend to be of an interstate nature, and are more likely than a state prosecution to be legally and factually complex.
  
Not all crimes can be prosecuted in federal court: the federal government has limited jurisdiction and can only prosecute cases that are specifically described in the federal criminal code.
In order to assert federal jurisdiction over a crime, the alleged criminal activity must involve either the federal government directly or some form of interstate commerce, and the federal courts have been very expansive in their definition of what constitutes "interstate commerce". In fact, the federal government now prosecutes a number of crimes that were traditionally prosecuted only in state court.
Federal criminal statutes have expanded rapidly in the last decade, and now criminalizes entire categories of activities that make it increasingly easy for Americans to end up on the wrong side of the law. Many of the new federal laws also set a lower bar for conviction than in the past: prosecutors don't necessarily need to show that the defendant had criminal intent.

Federal crimes may also carry stiffer sentences than state crimes, especially in the areas of drug trafficking and conspiracy. Federal penalties are more severe in cases involving child pornography and other sexual offenses prosecuted in federal court. Conversely, fraud and theft cases may result in lesser sentences than the same offense in state court, but generally speaking the system of mandatory minimum penalties and federal sentencing guidelines usually result in very lengthy sentences for people convicted of federal crimes.


Given the severity and complexity of federal criminal investigations and prosecutions, anyone charged with a federal crime should retain a lawyer who has extensive experience in federal criminal defense. Today's legal environment is highly complex and even intimidating, and this is particularly true in federal cases where a defendant can face the loss of important constitutional rights and the possibility of incarceration.
At Kuniansky & Associates we have the skills necessary to effectively defend individuals and corporations charged with a range of serious federal and state crimes. If you or someone you know is facing federal charges contact the offices of Kuniansky and Associates at 713-622-8333 or visit http://www.kunianskylaw.com for a free consultation.

Monday, August 19, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney Mail and Wire Fraud




Any criminal activity that involved the United States mail or electronic/digital communications is considered Mail or Wire Fraud. This includes the use of mail, television, radio or the internet in order to transmit false promises or advertisements to the public. Penalties may be up to $1,000,000 and 30 years in prison.

Mail fraud refers to any scheme which attempts to unlawfully obtain money or valuables in which the postal system is used at any point in the commission of a criminal offense. Mail fraud is a legal concept in the United States Code which can provide for increased penalty of any criminally fraudulent activity if it is determined that the activity involved used the United States Postal Service. This statute is often used as a basis for a separate federal prosecution of what would otherwise have been only a violation of a state law. Prosecution under the mail fraud statute must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:
  • That the statement is false;
  • That it was made with the intention it should be relied on;
  • That it was made for the purpose of securing money or property;
  • That the statement was delivered by mail;
  • That money or property was obtained by means of the false statement.

Wire fraud provides for enhanced penalty of any criminally fraudulent activity if it is determined that the activity involved electronic communications of any kind, at any phase of the event. As in the case of mail fraud, this statute is often used as a basis for a separate federal prosecution of what would otherwise have been only a violation of a state law.
The crime of wire fraud is codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and reads as follows:
"Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both."
 It is important to note that a victim does not need to actually be deprived of property or deceived for a conviction under the mail fraud or wire fraud statutes. The intent to deprive a victim of property is enough to convict. It also generally does not matter if the property in question is tangible or intangible: it can be enough to convict someone who intends to deprive a victim of their intangible right to control their assets. Each separate use of wire communication or the mail in furtherance of a scheme generally constitutes a separate offense.

If you or someone you know is facing mail or wire fraud charges do not risk having your rights violated by neglecting to retain a skilled, experienced criminal defense attorney. Visit www.mail-wire-fraud-attorney.com or contact the offices of Kuniansky and Associates at 713-622-8333 for a free consultation.


Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney Money Laundering




Money Laundering is the practice of engaging in financial transactions in order to conceal the identity, source, and/or destination of money, and is a main operation of the underground economy.
Historically the term "money laundering" was applied only to financial transactions related to organized crime, but today its definition is often expanded by government regulators to encompass any financial transaction which generates an asset or a value as the result of an illegal act, and may involve actions such as tax evasion or false accounting.

Starting in 1970 Congress passed a series of laws attempting to prevent "dirty" money from entering the US financial system in the first place. These laws, collectively known as the Bank Secrecy Act  (BSA, 31 USC 5311–5330), require virtually all  financial institutions to report cash transactions in excess of US$10,000 on a currency transaction report (CTR) which identifies the individual making the transaction as well as the source of the cash. The US is one of the few countries in the world to require reporting of all cash transactions over a certain limit, although certain businesses can be exempt from the requirement.

Additionally, financial institutions must file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) if they know or suspect that the funds either come from illegal activity or disguise funds from illegal activity, are structured to evade BSA requirements or appear to serve no known lawful purpose. Any attempt to circumvent the BSA (i.e., by breaking up cash deposits to amounts lower than US$10,000 and depositing them on different days or at different locations) also violates the law.
In addition to the BSA, the U.S. requires individuals to report the transportation of cash in excess of US$10,000 across its borders


The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 further defined money laundering as a federal crime. That legislation consists of two sections, 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and 18 U.S.C. § 1957, and prohibits individuals from engaging in transactions with the proceeds from certain specific crimes, known as "specified unlawful activities" (SUAs); the law also requires that an individual conceal the source, ownership or control of the funds. There is no minimum dollar amount, and no requirement for the transaction to succeed in actually disguising the money. Moreover, a "financial transaction" has been broadly defined and does not have to  involve a financial institution or even a business. Merely passing money from one person to another with the intent to disguise the source of the money has been deemed a financial transaction under the law.
 
Finally, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 expanded the scope of prior laws to more types of financial institutions, added a focus on terrorist financing, and specified that financial institutions take specific actions to "know your customer" (KYC).

Not only are money laundering prosecutions becoming more common, the penalties are often quite severe. Many people have concerns about the apparently broad application of these statutes, especially when they reach into legitimate business activities. A common example of this concern is a scenario where an individual or business handles money with no knowledge of any criminal origin, which could result in prosecution for money laundering in federal court.

It is a common tactic for a federal prosecutor to include money laundering and forfeiture allegations in an indictment. The money laundering crimes often carry harsher penalties than the underlying crime that created the money in the first place. Furthermore, prosecutors use these crimes to try and take away the defendants assets, as well as putting him or her in jail.


If you have been charged under the Bank Secrecy Act, the Money Laundering Control Act or the USA Patriot Act it is critical to your case that you hire effective legal representation right away: do not risk having your rights violated by neglecting to retain a skilled, experienced criminal defense attorney. The Houston Texas law office of Kuniansky & Associates will work diligently to ensure your rights are protected. Contact the offices of Kuniansky and Associates at 713-622-8333 or visit www.money-laundering-attorney.com  for a free consultation.

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Federal Conspiracy Charges




A conspiracy to commit a federal crime occurs when two or more people agree to commit a crime. In Federal court, defendants may be charged with both committing the crime and conspiring to commit the crime. To be charged with conspiracy, an individual does not have to have taken part in the commission of the criminal act; conspiracy is a separate crime, and charges may be applied even after the criminal offense occurs. Additionally, the government doesn’t have to prove that there was any written agreement between the co-conspirators; the prosecutor can prove a conspiracy just by proving that the people it says were involved in the conspiracy were working together to do some crime.
Courts have held that a person can be in a conspiracy with another person even if they have never met, as long as they knew the other person was doing something to further the conspiracy. This is common in situations such as illegal drug dealing where a central person or group of people is coordinating the work of others.

The United States Code contains several specific conspiracy provisions; the general federal conspiracy statute is 18 U.S.C. § 371, which criminalizes conspiracies to defraud the United States as well as conspiracies to violate any other provision of federal law.
In addition, 21 U.S.C. § 846 makes it illegal to commit a conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, or possess with intent to distribute controlled substances. 18 U.S.C. § 1951  prohibits committing a robbery of any article in interstate commerce and contains its own conspiracy provision.

One serious consequence of a conspiracy charge is that even very minor participants may be swept up in the same case as someone who is responsible for more serious criminal offenses. This is a particular problem in drug conspiracy cases in which a person who had a very minor role in a situation involving a significant quantity of drugs can be subject to a mandatory minimum for all the drugs in the conspiracy. Under the federal sentencing guidelines, penalties for committing a conspiracy and committing the underlying offense are usually the same. In order for the jury to find a defendant guilty of conspiracy, the jury does not have to conclude that he entered into an explicit agreement with another person to commit the crime, only that an understanding was reached.

Federal prosecutors like to bring conspiracy charges because it liberates them of certain evidentiary restrictions. Because conspiracy charges are so broad, and because so much of the law created by federal courts about conspiracy is challenging for people accused of federal conspiracy offenses, an attorney representing a client in a federal conspiracy case has to very carefully investigate the government’s evidence to know how to adequately defend his or her client. Conspiracy charges often give rise to complicated issues about when the conspiracy began, the admission of hearsay statements of some conspirators against others, whether the trial should be severed (i.e. the defendants tried individually), etc.

There must be substantial evidence in order for conspiracy charges to stick. There may be opportunity to discredit such charges with various legal defenses, such as claiming that the defendant removed themselves as a member of the conspiracy, that there never was an actual agreement, that there was no action taken towards the crime or that the conspiracy was a false accusation.


In order for the jury to find a defendant guilty of conspiracy, they only have to conclude that an understanding was reached between the accused parties. Under federal sentencing guidelines the penalties for committing a conspiracy is usually the same as for committing the underlying offense. If you are facing a conspiracy charge in federal court, it is especially important to retain a lawyer experienced in this area of law. Contact the offices of Kuniansky and Associates at 713-622-8333 for a free consultation.

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Asset Seizure and Forfeiture





Asset forfeiture is a term used to describe the confiscation of assets by the Government which are either the proceeds of crime or the "instrumentalities of crime". Instrumentalities of crime are property that was used to facilitate crime, for example cars used to transport illegal narcotics.

There are two types of forfeiture cases: criminal and civil. In civil forfeiture cases, the US Government sues the item of property, not the person; the owner is effectively a third party claimant. In contrast, criminal forfeiture is usually carried out in a sentence following a conviction and is a punitive act against the offender.
Before the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act was enacted in 2000, the government only had to establish probable cause that the property was subject to forfeiture; the owner had to prove on a "preponderance of the evidence" that it was not. The new law does hold the government to the "preponderance of evidence" standard and shifts the burden of proof to the federal government instead of the property owner, but the property owner still need not be found guilty of any crime.

Since the government can choose the type of case, a civil case is almost always chosen. The costs of such cases is high for the owner, usually totaling around $10,000 and can take up to three years. It should be noted however, that in 80% of asset forfeiture cases no one is ever charged with a crime. Federal agents often pursue forfeiture through sealed documents, or avoid the court system entirely by seizing assets without charging the owners with any crime in a procedure called "administrative forfeiture." This policy results in thousands of cases each year where the feds take cash, guns or other items from U.S. citizens without a judge or jury. Fifteen federal agencies have the power to seize assets, and over the past dozen years those agencies have taken more than $20 billion in cash, securities and other property. The United States Treasury Department is responsible for managing and disposing of properties seized by Treasury agencies.
The goal of both programs is to maximize the net return from seized property by selling at auctions and to the private sector, then using the property and proceeds for "law enforcement purposes".


In recent years, state and federal governments have used a wide variety of statutes to seize and ultimately confiscate personal and real property from American citizens. You must respond immediately to any notice that the government intends to go ahead with forfeiture proceedings: the forfeiture process has crucial deadlines and failure to respond may be devastating to your ability to defend your rights in court. 

At Kuniansky & Associates we have the skills necessary to effectively defend individuals and corporations charged with a range of serious federal and state crimes. We are committed to providing personal attention to every client and have a deep understanding of prosecutorial strategies, conducting thorough investigations and preparation in every case. We have more than 30 years of valuable trial experience to bring to your defense.
If you believe you may be under federal or state investigation for a crime, it is critical to your case that you hire a qualified criminal defense attorney right away. The law office of Kuniansky & Associates will work diligently to ensure your rights are protected. Visit www.forfeitures-attorney.com for more information or call (713) 622 8333 for a free consultation.

Monday, August 5, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Insider Trading



Insider trading is the trading of a public company's stock or other securities (such as bonds or stock options) by individuals with access to non-public information about the company.
"Corporate insiders" are defined as a company's officers, directors or any beneficial owners of more than 10% of a class of the company's equity securities. By accepting employment these insiders have undertaken the legal obligation to put the shareholders' interests before their own in matters related to the corporation. This means that any trades in the company's own stock made by these  insiders, if based on material non-public information, are considered fraudulent since the insiders are violating the fiduciary duty that they owe to the shareholders.
In addition, this duty may be imputed; for example, when a corporate insider "tips" a friend about non-public information likely to have an effect on the company's share price, the duty that insider owes the company may now be imputed to their friend. When allegations of a potential inside deal occur, all parties that may have been involved are at risk of being found guilty.
The Securities and Exchange Commission prosecutes over 50 cases of Insider Trading each year, with many being settled administratively out of court. The SEC and several stock exchanges actively monitor trading and can refer serious matters to the U.S. Attorney's Office for further investigation and prosecution.


US insider trading prohibitions are based on English and American common law prohibitions against fraud: as early as 1909 the United States Supreme Court ruled that a corporate director who bought company stock knowing it was about to jump in price committed fraud by not disclosing his inside information.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 was enacted after the stock market crash of 1929 to prohibit short-swing profits (from any purchases and sales within any six-month period) made by corporate directors, officers, or stockholders and to prohibit fraud related to securities trading. The Insider Trading Sanctions Act of 1984 and the Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of 1988 provide for penalties as high as three times the profit gained or the loss avoided from the illegal trading.

Defending those accused of white collar criminal charges is where our law firm stands out from the rest.
 Extensive experience combined with an intimate understanding of white collar legal issues gives you the edge in court, where it counts the most. Kuniansky and Associates works with stockbrokers, promoters, accountants and traders in preparing an effective legal defense. At Kuniansky & Associates we have the skills necessary to effectively defend individuals and corporations charged with a range of serious federal and state crimes. We are committed to providing personal attention to every client and have a deep understanding of prosecutorial strategies, conducting thorough investigations and preparation in every case. We have more than 30 years of valuable trial experience to bring to your defense.

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Mortgage Fraud



In mortgage lending, the paperwork is intensive and the regulations complex. It is easy to encounter legal problems if any documentation is deemed false, misleading, or incomplete. Government and industry fraud investigators often draw the wrong conclusions when examining records, and may persue criminal charges when there was no intent to defraud.
Mortgage fraud is being prosecuted with greater frequency and increased zeal in Texas and throughout the country: the FBI identified mortgage fraud as a “pervasive and growing” problem in the United States and has listed it as a “significant priority” in its Financial Crimes Report. Police, federal law enforcement, the securities division and state banking departments are carefully investigating and vigorously pursuing individuals who may have been involved in deceptive mortgage practices.

While there is no specific federal law governing mortgage fraud, the term generally covers laws that deal with real property transactions. In other words several types of fraud are used to comprise what the government calls mortgage fraud. Examples of the federal fraud law would be:
  • Mail Fraud- refers to any scheme which attempts to unlawfully obtain money or valuables in which the postal system is used at any point in the commission of a criminal offence. Mail fraud is a legal concept in the United States Code which can provide for increased penalty of any criminally fraudulent activity if it is determined that the activity involved used the United States Postal Service.
  • Wire Fraud- a legal concept that provides for enhanced penalty of any criminally fraudulent activity if it is determined that the activity involved electronic communications of any kind, at any phase of the event. As in the case of mail fraud, this statute is often used as a basis for a separate federal prosecution of what would otherwise have been only a violation of a state law.
  • Bank Fraud- false information provided to a FDIC insured bank 


In addition there are usually other counts such as money laundering. The base offense level can be a 6 or 7 on the sentencing guidelines, which provides for a possible probation sentence; however, if the loss exceeds $5,000.00 then the guidelines provide for a greater exposure of prison time. The maximum term of imprisonment for the fraud indictment is usually 20 years although other counts can increase this exposure.

There are many ways for home buyers to land in trouble with federal authorities while applying for a mortgage. Criminal intent may be assigned to honest mistakes in a mountain of required documentation, or charges could result from the lax practices of mortgage professionals trying to help buyers qualify for loans. Mortgage brokers, realtors, lenders and borrowers are also possible defendants in a mortgage fraud indictment; because of their fiduciary roles, industry insiders can face enhanced criminal penalties if found guilty of profiting from fraudulent transactions through kickbacks, fees, or commissions.  Many borrowers have also been indicted based upon the documents they were encouraged to sign in obtaining their loans.

A criminal mortgage fraud defense attorney must research and investigate a mortgage fraud indictment at many levels. Mr. Kuniansky works closely with forensic accountants, financial experts, CPAs and former bank officials in preparing his clients' defense. 
Our office is experienced in defending mortgage fraud cases in several federal courts throughout the country. At Kuniansky & Associates we have the skills necessary to effectively defend individuals and corporations charged with a range of serious federal and state crimes. We are committed to providing personal attention to every client and have a deep understanding of prosecutorial strategies, conducting thorough investigations and preparation in every case. We have more than 30 years of valuable trial experience to bring to your defense, and represent bank officials, loan officers, loan processors, loan recruiters and promoters, straw buyers, underwriters, account managers, appraisers, mortgage and real estate brokers and agents.

For more information visit mortgage-fraud-attorney.com or contact us at (713) 622 8333 for a free consultation.

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: White Collar Crime




White-collar crime is defined as a financially motivated, nonviolent crime committed for illegal monetary gain. Although there has been some debate as to what actually qualifies as a white-collar crime, the term today generally encompasses a variety of nonviolent crimes usually committed in commercial situations. Many white-collar crimes are especially difficult to prosecute due to complex transactions. Examples include fraud, bribery, Ponzi schemes, insider trading, embezzlement, cybercrime, copyright infringement, money laundering, identity theft, and forgery.

According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, white-collar crime is estimated to cost the United States more than $300 billion annually. Although typically the government charges individuals for white-collar crimes, the government has the power to sanction corporations as well for these offenses. The penalties for white-collar offenses may include fines, forfeitures, restitution and imprisonment. However, sanctions can be lessened if the defendant takes responsibility for the crime and assists the authorities in their investigation. Any defenses available to non-white-collar defendants in criminal court are also available to those accused of white-collar crimes. A common refrain of individuals or organizations facing white-collar criminal charges is the defense of entrapment.

The activities that constitute white-collar criminal offenses may be covered by both state and federal legislation; the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution gives the federal government the authority to regulate white-collar crime, and a number of federal agencies including the FBI, the IRS, U.S. Customs and the Securities and Exchange Commission all participate in the enforcement of federal white-collar crime legislation. In addition, most states employ their own agencies to enforce white-collar crime laws at the state level.

To combat white-collar crime, the U.S. Congress passed a wave of laws and statutes in the 1970s and 80s. The Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), originally associated with organized crime, was also applied to white-collar crime. Under RICO, racketeering now includes embezzlement from union funds, bribery and mail fraud. RICO has made it easier to prosecute organizations and seize assets related to corruption, as well as allowing states or people to sue perpetrators for up to three times the amount of damages. Since the United States tightened its federal sentencing guidelines, white collar criminals now face longer sentences with less opportunity for early release. Opponents argue that white-collar crime punishment is too harsh, considering that white collar criminals tend to be first-time offenders.

If you believe you may be under federal investigation for a white collar crime, it is critical to your case that you hire a qualified criminal defense attorney right away. Do not risk having your rights violated by neglecting to retain a skilled, experienced criminal defense attorney. Contact the Houston, Texas, law office of Kuniansky & Associates today. We will work diligently to ensure your rights are protected. We represent individuals accused of federal criminal fraud, including tax fraud and Medicare fraud. Our clients include individual businessmen, as well as corporate officers and directors facing charges or investigations for mail fraud, wire fraud, antitrust violations, money laundering, and embezzlement. We will thoroughly investigate the facts of the case and the law to ensure we understand all viable options. We will not rush to a plea and are ready, willing, and able to go to trial in a white collar crime case when it is in our client's best interest. Our reputation for skilled litigation is one of the strongest tools we provide our clients.

Richard Kuniansky has over 30 years experience with white collar crime cases and handles them on a daily basis. We have a unique understanding of the government's strategy and will work vigorously on our clients' behalf to defend their interests. Contact Kuniansky & Associates today for committed legal advocacy.

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney: Healthcare Fraud


Health care fraud is a "white-collar crime" involving the filing of dishonest health care claims in order to turn a profit: the FBI estimates that Health care fraud costs American tax payers $80 billion a year. Health care professionals and institutions must comply with extensive and onerous civil regulations, and failure to comply can eventually result in federal prosecution.
Fraudulent health care schemes come in many forms; prosecutors aggressively pursue health care providers who allegedly get paid for services they do not provide or lie about the number of patients served or the services rendered, as well as patients who may provide false information when applying for programs or services, forge or sell prescription drugs, use transportation benefits for non-medical related purposes, or use another’s insurance card. 
Physicians may even be prosecuted for referring patients to a facility or institution in which they have a financial interest: such physician self-referral is explicitly banned under federal criminal law.

During the course of healthcare fraud investigations, agencies often request billing records, financial statements and information about patient care. In some cases, even if a doctor or medical equipment supplier hasn't committed fraud, poor record-keeping or even panic may lead them to destroy records or secure files away from investigators; destroying, removing, or withholding files can constitute an obstruction of justice and even though the accused may be acquitted of fraud charges they could be charged with obstructing justice.

When a health care fraud is perpetrated, the health care provider passes the costs along to its customers. Because of the pervasiveness of health care fraud, statistics now show that 10 cents of every dollar spent on health care goes toward paying for fraudulent health care claims.

Congressional legislation requires that health care insurance pay a legitimate claim within 30 days. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Postal Service, and the Office of the Inspector General all are charged with the responsibility of investigating healthcare fraud. However, because of the 30-day rule, these agencies rarely have enough time to perform an adequate investigation before an insurer has to pay.

Prescription fraud: 

Prescription fraud criminal charges are most often filed against people suffering from chronic pain and serious medical problems. Though legal consequences for drug charges can be severe, alleged violators of prescription medication laws often experience leniency from the court system when working with a thoroughly prepared criminal defense attorney because:
  • The accused is often facing his or her first criminal offence
  • Prescription fraud rates low in the courts' "culpability index" because no one was injured or suffered significant loss because of the alleged crime
  • The courts tend to be lenient on defendants driven to commit crimes because of excessive physical pain
  • Addictions to painkillers are the most common reason people commit prescription fraud. In fact, most people who commit this crime have been legally prescribed the medication in the past for a specific medical purpose then become addicted.

It is illegal for anyone to alter a prescription written by a medical doctor. For example, a person cannot increase their prescription or change the type of medication they were prescribed. People are also caught phoning in fake prescriptions and impersonating medical personnel. Another common type of prescription fraud is forging the label.
 If you are prescribed a medication from one doctor, it is illegal to visit other doctors in an attempt to try to get more prescriptions written for you. This is called doctor shopping and it is illegal. There have also been cases where medical staff or patients steal blank prescription pads. With the advent of the Internet, some people try to get their prescriptions filled online in a fraudulent manner.

False billing or filing duplicate claims for the same service: 

The Offices of Medicare and Medicaid Management reviews recipient utilization and investigates other charges of fraudulent behavior in order to take action against them. The federal government is vigilant in trying to catch institutions trying to bill for services not rendered, creating fraudulent cost reports, making kickbacks or self-referrals, etc. They frequently assemble thorough, well-researched health care fraud cases.
Medicaid/Medicare Provider (Medical Office) Fraud: 
  • Billing for services that were not provided, e.g., a chest x-ray that was not taken.
  • Duplicate billing which occurs when a provider bills Medicaid and also bills private insurance and/or the recipient.
  • Requiring the recipient to return to the office for more visits when another appointment is not necessary. • Taking unnecessary x-rays, blood work, etc.
  •  Upcoding, e.g., providing a simple office visit and billing for a comprehensive visit.
  • Having an unlicensed person perform services that only a licensed professional should render, and bills as if the professional provided the service.
  • Billing for more time than actually provided, i.e., counseling, anesthesia, etc.
  • Billing for an office visit when there was none, or adding additional family members' names to bills. 
  • Accepting payment from another provider, including sharing in the reimbursement paid by the Medicaid program, as a result of referring a patient to the other provider. 

Altering or failure to keep proper records: 

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) created a national standard for protecting the privacy of patients' personal health information. The law requires healthcare entities that use electronic means to process transactions, which include health information, to use standardized forms and a universal code system for illnesses and treatments. The regulation also requires safeguards to protect the security and confidentiality of an individual's protected health information.

Deliberately breaking HIPAA's rules could undermine member trust and could place staff and the organization at risk for penalties under HIPAA as well as other laws.
  • HIPAA allows both civil and criminal penalties, including fines and possible time in jail. 
  • The Office of Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human Services enforces civil violations, and the Department of Justice enforces criminal violations of the HIPAA Standards. 
  • Civil penalties are usually monetary fines. HIPAA allows fines of up to $100 for each violation of the law, to a limit of $25,000 per year for violations of the same requirement. 
  • Criminal sanctions for knowing misuse or disclosures of PHI carry fines of $50,000 to $250,000 and one to ten years imprisonment. 

Accepting or giving kickbacks for member referrals, waiving member co-pays, or prescribing additional or unnecessary treatment: 

In 1972, Congress passed the anti-kickback statute which made it illegal for providers, including doctors, to knowingly and willfully accept bribes or other forms of remuneration in return for generating Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare program business. Likewise, a physician cannot offer anything of value to induce federal healthcare program business. Since its creation, the anti-kickback statute has been revised to allow more than 20 exceptions or “safe harbors” such as for investments in group practices.

The safe harbor rules cover such activities as investments in publicly traded companies, joint ventures, rentals of space or equipment, personal services agreements, sales of practice, discounts and other arrangements. The OIG has since issued a final safe harbor for managed care arrangements involving particular price reductions and enrollee incentives. Several proposed safe harbors that include exceptions for investment interests in rural areas have not yet been finalized.
Conduct that falls outside a safe harbor does not mean an individual or entity automatically has violated the law. However, compliance with the safe harbor requirements will protect a transaction from anti-kickback scrutiny by the OIG and the Justice Department. ACR members should carefully evaluate the unique facts and circumstances of each arrangement in their local jurisdictions with their practices' legal counsel.

Recent federal legislation has expanded the scope of the anti-kickback law and its penalties. Federal law enforcement agencies such as the OIG and the Justice Department regard the law as a key weapon in the anti-fraud and anti-abuse tool kit. Additionally, ACR members-both those who are hospital-based and those who are practicing in groups or clinics-face potential kickback violations in financial arrangements with other physicians, hospitals and managed care organizations.

Use of unlicensed staff, prescription or sales of unproven remedies or improper use of equipment: 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) governs a substantial percentage as well. Whether companies under FDA or USDA jurisdiction are bringing a new product to market, responding to an agency enforcement action, improving or responding to food safety and drug safety practices and needs, or attempting to challenge a new regulatory initiative, businesses regulated by FDA or USDA must know how to navigate the regulatory process. They must also clearly understand the legislative process and how new legislation can impact their businesses. Individuals and companies under FDA, USDA, and DEA jurisdiction are subject to stringent public health statutes, and violation of these statutes carries the risk of civil and criminal liability.

An increase of federal FDA investigators has led to an elevated level of inspections across the United States and abroad. Consequently, there has been an array of new violations as well as repeat violations. Repeat violations result in the formation of industry trends and can be quite alarming when you consider that different areas of the country and world are making the same mistakes.

A successful prosecution of a health care provider that ends in a conviction can have serious consequences. The health care provider faces incarceration, fines, and possibly losing the right to practice in the medical industry.

At Kuniansky & Associates we have the skills necessary to effectively defend individuals and corporations charged with a range of serious federal and state crimes. We are committed to providing personal attention to every client and have a deep understanding of prosecutorial strategies, conducting thorough investigations and preparation in every case. We have more than 30 years of valuable trial experience to bring to your defense.

If you believe you may be under federal or state investigation for a crime, it is critical to your case that you hire a qualified criminal defense attorney right away. Visit our Health Care Fraud website for more information, or call (713) 622-8333 today for a free consultation.

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney Child Pornography


Most child pornography cases are Internet related. The government has been cracking down on Internet child porn and Internet crimes against children by conducting Internet stings with the purpose of trapping alleged child predators and pedophiles. If you have been implicated in a child porn investigation, contact a thorough and aggressive defense attorney right away.
We will work with forensic experts in conducting a meticulous investigation and analysis into the facts of the case to determine whether the particular child pornography was, in fact, disseminated by our accused client.
We will vigorously negotiate on behalf of our clients to contest all of the factors that could enhance a sentence. We will also work with psychologists and psychiatrists in formulating an effective defense for our client to determine any factors that would mitigate our accused client's punishment.
We understand the complexities involved with trying a case of this type. There are not only legal implications, but personal and professional ones as well. The firm has handled a number child pornography cases, and Mr. Kuniansky has lectured on several occasions at Houston Bar Association on the defense of child pornography cases.

There is no measure of the damage a child pornography conviction could have on an individual for the rest of his or her life. If you are under investigation, or have been arrested on a child porn charge, you need an experienced and thorough criminal defense lawyer right away. At Kuniansky & Associates, we understand the complexities involved in these sensitive matters. Contact us today at (713) 224-2815 or visit www.kunianskylaw.com  for committed advocacy from a skilled Houston, Texas, attorney.

Monday, June 24, 2013

Houston Criminal Attorney Federal Tax Fraud


Tax fraud (or tax evasion) is the general term for efforts by individuals, firms, trusts and other entities to evade taxes by illegal means. Tax evasion usually entails taxpayers deliberately misrepresenting or concealing the true state of their affairs to the tax authorities to reduce their tax liability, and includes, in particular, dishonest tax reporting (such as declaring less income, profits or gains than actually earned; or overstating deductions).
In the United States "tax evasion" is evading the assessment or payment of a tax that is already legally owed at the time of the criminal conduct. Tax evasion is criminal, and has no effect on the amount of tax actually owed, although it may give rise to substantial monetary penalties.


In the case of U.S. Federal income taxes, civil penalties for willful failure to timely file returns and willful failure to timely pay taxes are based on the amount of tax due; thus, if no tax is owed, no penalties are due. The civil penalty for willful failure to timely file a return is generally equal to 5.0% of the amount of tax "required to be shown on the return per month, up to a maximum of 25%. By contrast, the civil penalty for willful failure to timely pay the tax actually "shown on the return" is generally equal to 0.5% of such tax due per month, up to a maximum of 25%. The two penalties are computed together in a relatively complex algorithm, and computing the actual penalties due is somewhat challenging.

If you or your company has been accused of failing to comply with Tax Laws, the consequences could be serious - including imprisonment and harsh fines. It is important to work with a qualified defense attorney who can help you get the best possible results. Kuniansky and Associates is dedicated to the vigorous defense of clients who have been charged or accused of "white collar" criminal offenses including tax fraud, theft, and embezzlement. To learn more visit www.tax-fraud-attorney.com or contact Kuniansky and Associates at (713)-622-8333 for a free consultation.